<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t say UCD is incompatible with agile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/</link>
	<description>It's all about the human experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/comment-page-1/#comment-6593</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/#comment-6593</guid>
		<description>A lot depends on the fidelity of the prototype. I&#039;m more than happy to sketch wireframes on the whiteboard and do paper prototyping when it helps get the job done.

However I&#039;ve seen people take weeks to produce lovely bound wireframe documents, where I would already be working on the second iteration.

Prototypes are great - but I feel some people think producing them is their reason for existing. It isn&#039;t. Their job is to help build software.

I think we can move to code a lot sooner than many folk in the UCD profession do. Changing the UI is a lot cheaper than it used to be - and working code gets me more effective feedback more quickly in certain areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot depends on the fidelity of the prototype. I&#8217;m more than happy to sketch wireframes on the whiteboard and do paper prototyping when it helps get the job done.</p>
<p>However I&#8217;ve seen people take weeks to produce lovely bound wireframe documents, where I would already be working on the second iteration.</p>
<p>Prototypes are great &#8211; but I feel some people think producing them is their reason for existing. It isn&#8217;t. Their job is to help build software.</p>
<p>I think we can move to code a lot sooner than many folk in the UCD profession do. Changing the UI is a lot cheaper than it used to be &#8211; and working code gets me more effective feedback more quickly in certain areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notta Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agile + User Centered Design</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/comment-page-1/#comment-6571</link>
		<dc:creator>Notta Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agile + User Centered Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/#comment-6571</guid>
		<description>[...] So, Marc says User Centered Design is compatible with Agile. I think I agree, but with a caveat or two. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, Marc says User Centered Design is compatible with Agile. I think I agree, but with a caveat or two. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/comment-page-1/#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/#comment-6566</guid>
		<description>Well said. As a UCD practitioner who has thrown himself into the Agile Dev foray, I&#039;ve definitely found that the Agile Methods that I&#039;ve run into in practice thus far are as User Centered as one cares to make them. My only ongoing worry is that UCD (and even just plain ol&#039; Design) methods don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;necessarily&lt;/i&gt; have a set place in XP, Scrum, etc. Though, I guess it&#039;s the same for other Dev processes...still, I&#039;d like to see a little less emphasis on Customer satisfaction, instead putting more weight on User satisfaction. I think then we&#039;ll see UCD+Agile start to act as a cohesive unit and as a standard practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. As a UCD practitioner who has thrown himself into the Agile Dev foray, I&#8217;ve definitely found that the Agile Methods that I&#8217;ve run into in practice thus far are as User Centered as one cares to make them. My only ongoing worry is that UCD (and even just plain ol&#8217; Design) methods don&#8217;t <i>necessarily</i> have a set place in XP, Scrum, etc. Though, I guess it&#8217;s the same for other Dev processes&#8230;still, I&#8217;d like to see a little less emphasis on Customer satisfaction, instead putting more weight on User satisfaction. I think then we&#8217;ll see UCD+Agile start to act as a cohesive unit and as a standard practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Buckley</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/comment-page-1/#comment-6554</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2006/12/13/dont-say-ucd-is-incompatible-with-agile/#comment-6554</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m slightly baffled that someone would claim them to be incompatible. I&#039;d always assumed that low-fi prototypes and the like (as opposed to expensive semi-functional but ultimately throwaway demo apps) were a core agile technique &#8211; all part of &lt;em&gt;customer collaboration&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m slightly baffled that someone would claim them to be incompatible. I&#8217;d always assumed that low-fi prototypes and the like (as opposed to expensive semi-functional but ultimately throwaway demo apps) were a core agile technique &ndash; all part of <em>customer collaboration</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
