<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The scourge of Document Driven Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/</link>
	<description>It's all about the human experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A A picture tells a thousand words. So prioritize pictures not words &#124; dancingmango</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/comment-page-1/#comment-130101</link>
		<dc:creator>A A picture tells a thousand words. So prioritize pictures not words &#124; dancingmango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/#comment-130101</guid>
		<description>[...] That didn&#8217;t take long did it, and it looks like an initial release candidate. We&#8217;ve defined our scope in a way that we do not believe we can cut any more.  Any less functionality would not be a meaningful release.  Now we can get down to writing the stories, focusing our effort on something we are agreed looks right.  We&#8217;ve prioritized pictures, outcomes over words; Picture Driven Design. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That didn&#8217;t take long did it, and it looks like an initial release candidate. We&#8217;ve defined our scope in a way that we do not believe we can cut any more.  Any less functionality would not be a meaningful release.  Now we can get down to writing the stories, focusing our effort on something we are agreed looks right.  We&#8217;ve prioritized pictures, outcomes over words; Picture Driven Design. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant Gandhi</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/comment-page-1/#comment-82777</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant Gandhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/#comment-82777</guid>
		<description>All the crows that I have seen are black. Hence, all crows must be black.

Yes, empirical evidence does point to &quot;picture saying a thousand words&quot; and I do think its true. But one must not disregard the power of written word. You and I write using words. Your blog is a set of words, not pictures. People still read it. Just as you can have badly written documents, you can have badly drawn diagrams as well and they can be equally frustrating. 

The difference, if you like, lies in the ability of the author to address his/her audience. And I dont even think pictures are the best medium. I find that videos and audios are probably more powerful medium to capture important concepts. Would you go through a powerpoint deck with pictures or look at a 3 minute video with commentary from the SME where they explain a difficult concept ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the crows that I have seen are black. Hence, all crows must be black.</p>
<p>Yes, empirical evidence does point to &#8220;picture saying a thousand words&#8221; and I do think its true. But one must not disregard the power of written word. You and I write using words. Your blog is a set of words, not pictures. People still read it. Just as you can have badly written documents, you can have badly drawn diagrams as well and they can be equally frustrating. </p>
<p>The difference, if you like, lies in the ability of the author to address his/her audience. And I dont even think pictures are the best medium. I find that videos and audios are probably more powerful medium to capture important concepts. Would you go through a powerpoint deck with pictures or look at a 3 minute video with commentary from the SME where they explain a difficult concept ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Patel</title>
		<link>http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/comment-page-1/#comment-81728</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancingmango.com/blog/2008/07/22/the-scourge-of-document-driven-design/#comment-81728</guid>
		<description>Marc,

Have to agree on the sentiment.  Document Driven Design can seriously knock agile projects out of kilter (especially when the client changes their mind about what they originally wrote! I don’t think developers like surprises…)

I always used pictures to convey ideas, and came to this realisation: it&#039;s the *motion* of drawing arrows and boxes that helps people understand; not always the drawing itself.  I sometimes find myself re-drawing the same picture for different audiences. Making these processes interactive always yields the best results.

In fact, our Domain Modeling tool was created to end this scourge 

Cheers.
Vijay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>Have to agree on the sentiment.  Document Driven Design can seriously knock agile projects out of kilter (especially when the client changes their mind about what they originally wrote! I don’t think developers like surprises…)</p>
<p>I always used pictures to convey ideas, and came to this realisation: it&#8217;s the *motion* of drawing arrows and boxes that helps people understand; not always the drawing itself.  I sometimes find myself re-drawing the same picture for different audiences. Making these processes interactive always yields the best results.</p>
<p>In fact, our Domain Modeling tool was created to end this scourge </p>
<p>Cheers.<br />
Vijay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
